“Infowars Reporter Joe Biggs Goes to University of Texas in Austin to ask students if they will sign a petition to kill newborn babies up to 5 yrs old. This was done in light of an article on “The College Fix” site where students across America at different colleges were asked if they supported Post-Birth Abortion.”
Students Sign Petition
To Kill Newborns (Up To 5 yrs Old)
The “test to sign the petition” was drawn up because of an article published October 29, 2014, in TheCollegeFix.com:
“Anecdotal evidence by leaders of prolife groups such as Created Equal and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust said in interviews that not only do they see more college students willing to say they support post-birth abortion, but some students even suggest children up to 4 or 5-years-old can also be killed, because they are not yet “self aware.”
“We encounter people who think it is morally acceptable to kill babies after birth on a regular basis at almost every campus we visit,” said Mark Harrington, director of Created Equal. “While this viewpoint is still seen as shocking by most people, it is becoming increasingly popular.”
The phenomenon is called infanticide–the moral permissibility of after birth abortion.
According to the CollegeFix, Peter Singer wrote in 1979 that “human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons … [therefore] the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.”
This is the philosophy being promulgated by the colleges as reading assignments to students.
Kristina Garza spokeswoman for the Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust, a pro-life organization that often sets up anti-abortion displays on campuses along the West Coast, frequently tell her group they encounter college students who accept infanticide.
“When he said this stuff, there was a very select few who accepted it. But nowadays, we have become so desensitized, and college students lacking in a moral fiber easily accept this kind of strange ideology.”
In 2013, Rigina A. Rini wrote an article (downloadable pdf) for the Journal of Medical Ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom, titled “Of Course the Baby Should Live: “Against After Birth Abortion”.
In reading the abstract of the text, I found it incredibly uncomfortable to believe that such highly educated people can still debate the value of a human being and not write a convinceable paper supporting the right to life of an unborn child.
Life begins the second that the male and female mate causing the sperm and egg to co-mingle with blood cells creating the fetus. What’s so difficult about that? Life is in the blood!
Why are people so confused? Is it a lack of accountability? The “Oops, I’ve made a mistake and I don’t want anyone to know about it?” The regret of the “It just happened?” “It just isn’t the right time?” What?
The “right to choose” and the “to empower women” have clouded the real issue, death to the unborn.
The World Health Organization has published a statistical report 2011 (pdf) by country or area, outlining ‘legal grounds on which abortion is permitted’ ‘abortion rates’, ‘family planning, women aged 15-44, etc.:
Christ Jesus said in Matthew 18:6:
- “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Times are becoming more and more difficult and the failure to train up a child in the way they should go, will ultimately come down to judgment.